Already a member?
Sign in
Location:
Official MythBusters Fan Site
Threads
Keyword tags
Keyword tags: None
Posting...
Note: You can enter up to [REMCHARS] additional characters.
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| funnypetname | The crocs vs. a piece of wood | 0 | 38 minutes ago by funnypetname | |||
|
Thread started: 38 minutes ago
Watch
I'm curious if a croc can rip a boar a part how come when you stick a piece of wood(as seen on movies and cartoons) the croc can't close it's mouth. If this is possible and you guys proved it, you will save countless lives all around the world.
|
||||||
| jerryred | THE FOOTBALL | 5 | Friday, 1:52 PM EDT by TrueThanny | |||
|
Thread started: May 9 2008, 1:52 PM EDT
Watch
I HAVE A QUESTION THAT HAS BEEN HAUNTING ME FOR YEARS??
JUST BEFORE THE KICKOFF, AT THE START OF A FOOTBALL GAME, OR AFTER A TOUCHDOWN, AND THE KICKER SQUEEZES THE FOOTBALL BEFORE PLACING IT ON THE KICKING TEE, WHAT IF ANYTHING DOES THIS DO TO THE FOOTBALL? HAVE THE ENGINEERS FROM WILSON SPORTING GOODS, OR ANY OTHER FOOTBALL MANUFACTURES MADE ANY SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ON THE SUBJECT? DOES IT CHANGE THE SHAPE, SQUEEZE AIR OUT, THUSLY MAKING IT MORE AERODYNAMIC? I BELIEVE(AND I HAVE BEEN WRONG BEFORE) IN NEWTON'S THIRD LAW OF RELATIVITY THAT FOR EVERY ACTION THER IS AN OPPOSITE AND EQUAL REACTION, THERFORE SQUEZZING THE FOOTBALL BEFORE PLACING IT ON THE TEE DOES ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING TO THE FOOTBALL AT ALL!!! WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON MY THEORY?
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Marxman | water tenshion breaking grenade | 0 | Thursday, 12:00 PM EDT by Marxman | |||
|
Thread started: Thursday, 12:00 PM EDT
Watch
we know a hammer isn't likely to help you when falling off a tall bridge, but can a grenade
launcher fired at the water do anything for you? I think it might produce enough gas bubbles in the water to cushion the fall. |
||||||
| smartblonde64 | I need information on finding foam | 2 | Wednesday, 6:35 PM EDT by martiandrifter01 | |||
|
Thread started: Monday, 10:38 PM EDT
Watch
I am making a foam statue for my son's graduation dance. I am designing it after the "Oscar's" statue. Does anyone have any good ideas on what type of material I should use and where to get it? I've been looking with no luck. I think I'm looking for a 6x3 foot block of foam or the liquid foam that forms and expands and/or hardens in a five gallon bucket.
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| funnypetname | Knife amplification | 0 | Tuesday, 1:26 PM EDT by funnypetname | |||
|
Thread started: Tuesday, 1:26 PM EDT
Watch
I was just wondering if a knife stuck in a tree can amplify vibrations from the soil.
|
||||||
| funnypetname | A person ramming another person through a concrete wall | 1 | May 11 2008, 1:04 PM EDT by amy_c | |||
|
Thread started: May 11 2008, 11:21 AM EDT
Watch
I've seen it in countless action movies when a bad guy rams a good guy through a concrete wall and still, the good guy manages to get up and take a punch or two and still is strong enough to give the bad guy a punch or two.
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| MrCommonSince | create fire with ice | 13 | May 9 2008, 11:35 PM EDT by martiandrifter01 | |||
|
Thread started: Nov 9 2007, 10:43 AM EST
Watch
can you create fire with ice....the myth is that you could rub two ice cubes together so fast that the friction would be hot enough to create fire....i understand friction creates heat,,,but in this case, wouldnt the water turn to steam long before you could get fire.....to understand it on a bigger scale,,,imagine a airplane made of ice, if it crash landed on a glacier at top speed would there be enough friction to generate fire.........
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| xnubuy | gaz tank | 1 | May 8 2008, 10:11 PM EDT by xnubuy | |||
|
Thread started: May 8 2008, 10:09 PM EDT
Watch
i just saw the water tank myth and im wondering what would happen if they put way to much pressure in one of those tank use to store helium in the helium baloon where the kid get taken away by those baloon...by the way in brazil a preist got the same idea he sat on a chair attached by some helium filled balloon and now he is missing hehehehe
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| smilts | The Benjamin Franklin kite and electricity Myth | 6 | May 8 2008, 8:47 PM EDT by TrueThanny | |||
|
Thread started: Mar 20 2008, 12:29 AM EDT
Watch
I was wondering in this myth they wanted to see if a kite with a lightening rod could conduct electricity to a key and from the key to a human and finally rather the human would live or not. They said there was no way he could live through a strike like that. My only problem with this is that people do live through lightening strikes. So isnt possible that he could have?
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| valente163 | Plane on treadmill | 15 | May 5 2008, 7:21 PM EDT by valente163 | |||
|
Thread started: May 3 2008, 7:58 AM EDT
Watch
As I understand it, the conjecture is that a plane cannot take off if the plane is going EXACTLY the same speed as the treadmill. In theory if that is so, then the plane will be stopped relative to the ground and also if the wind speed is "0" relative to the ground, there can be no air flowing past the wings. Therefore there can be NO LIFT from the wings. The second point that Martin mentioned, occurred to me to, namely that the airflow caused by the propellor past the wings, would cause some lift. I noticed on the MYTHBUSTERS episode that the propellor was some distance below the wings, and hence I would suppose that would cause minimum lift. However when the plane took off in the episode, THE PLANE WAS OBVIOUSLY MOVING RELATIVE TO THE GROUND AND HENCE AIR. Therfore the plane was moving a good bit faster than the "CONVEYOR BELT" It was this forward motion RELATIVE TO THE GROUND AND AIR which caused takeoff. Imagine that the plane was tied at it's back end to the ground. You now go to full revs. The plane will pull on the tether but still be stopped relative to the ground. Now under those circumstances, would anybody expect the plane to lift?(assuming negligeable lift from propellor wind) I say NO. Now imagine that you introduce a conveyor belt underneath the wheels(It could be on a conveyor belt which is stopped) Now ramp up the conveyor belt speed until the tether registers "0" tension and any faster, the plane would go bacwards. At that point if you cut the tether, would you expect the plane to lift? of course not because you have exactly the same situation as when the conveyor belt was stopped, the only difference being that the wheels are turning!!
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| ANSWERS-101 | PLANE ON A TREADMILL | 18 | May 5 2008, 4:10 PM EDT by k9306 | |||
|
Thread started: Mar 21 2008, 3:55 PM EDT
Watch
Everybody seems to be missing the essential point. Once the propeller starts to move air over the wings, the lift thus created will eventually separate the wheels from the treadmill and at that point and that point only, the plane will begin to move forward. The only role that the treadmill plays is determining the point at which the plane takes off. Whether going 10 mph or 1000 mph the essential physical issue is the forward speed of the leading edge of the wing in regard to the air in which it is located. Obviously one can envision scenarios in which this doesn't work, but within the realm of 'realistic' application, once the speed of the wind flowing rearward over the wing creates sufficient lift, the plane detaches from the ground and begins forward motion.
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Neshoba | Na explosion | 0 | May 4 2008, 2:59 PM EDT by Neshoba | |||
|
Thread started: May 4 2008, 2:59 PM EDT
Watch
I saw your show where you tried to explode a hole in a brick wall using pure sodium (Na+) and had less than desired results. I have a story i was once told and he had a different experience, or so he said. There is a twist to what he did that might make a difference.
I was once told by a doctor i worked with that he once had a 8 ounce block of sodium. He obtained the Na+ from a lab class. The instructor had demonstrated how volitile the Na+ was. Well, my friend obtained this Na+ and started to "play" with it. He got word that the school was aware he might have the Na+, and in a panic he decided he needed to get rid of the now undesired play material. So, as his story was told to me he went to the public restroom to dispose of what he had left. He did not say how much but i assumed from his telling it was a major portion of the original mass ( he indicated as size of a hardball). As i said he was in a panic and went to the closest toilet flushed it and threw the ball of Na+ in. According to him the results were that he woke up sometime after he threw the ball intio the water across the room covered in porcelin and a loud ringing in his ears. The variable in his story to your busting of the famous tinkerer's tale is rather than a passive method a toilet of the tankless variety that flushes with such a flurry you could lose ideas when you flushed under normal conditions. It seems to me that the added water and air would be like a carberator venturi affect. So Myth or Fact. Would love to see you test this one. Was it a funny story or a real life, ummmm, adventure? Thanks and i love the show Nesh |
||||||
| dympy | DVD box sets | 0 | May 3 2008, 8:54 PM EDT by dympy | |||
|
Thread started: May 3 2008, 8:54 PM EDT
Watch
Hi there, does anyone know if it possible to get Mythbusters on DVDs that are suitable for Ireland/Europe? Been looking for ages but cant seem to get my hands on them. Thanks
|
||||||
| likesexplosions2much | Adam and Jamie just can't get enough can they? | 1 | May 2 2008, 1:11 AM EDT by wavemaster_Elk | |||
|
Thread started: May 2 2008, 1:02 AM EDT
Watch
it seems Adam and Jamie just can't get enough spontaneous combustions and explosions ON THEIR OWN SHOW! both of them appear on an episode of CSI, for those who want to see the episode it's "the theory of everything" about a person who combusted when they were hit with a taser, and that just gave me an idea! why don't they do that for a myth? they were there behind a glass wall and watched a balisitcs gel dummy get lit up, so why don't they say how they did it on the show and see if it can happen under the circumstances on the show?
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| BillML | Yanking Axle Out of Police Car | 0 | May 1 2008, 4:46 PM EDT by BillML | |||
|
Thread started: May 1 2008, 4:46 PM EDT
Watch
Yeah, like in the movie. I recall that this was busted. NOT. I know for a fact that this has happened. Circa 1961/62, I-75 was only getting started, US441 went to a 4-laning. Because of the construction, we opted to use a county road and come back west into Gainesville FL. Now on that county road (North from Micanopy) there was an incident where some jokers went around that bend, stopped and walked back through the woods and chained the axle of a sheriff or FHP car (watching for speeders) to a tree. Yes, it probably was like a '61 Ford. Reportedly it worked, and contrary to the Mythbusters test (cable). My confirmation was my dad who was a police officer with the State.
|
||||||
| Slylark_sleepR | spliting an arrow | 2 | May 1 2008, 1:50 PM EDT by arrowhawk | |||
|
Thread started: Apr 29 2008, 2:28 PM EDT
Watch
just like to say grate job trying to split an arrow , just like to inform you that two weeks ago, i and another club member was shooting at 50 m and he just so happen to shoot my arrow right in the center of my arrow and split it an inch, As i shoot with carbon arrows they have a reinforced center so they don't split to well. i will have a pic for you as soon as possible. your fatefully Christopher Stanton, Adelaide, South Australia
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Akrainbow | Car going through the ice | 2 | May 1 2008, 10:27 AM EDT by NDVW | |||
|
Thread started: Apr 27 2008, 1:39 AM EDT
Watch
The team had one variable wrong in the Alaska Show. They gave too much credit for caution to the people who drive on ice. People up here who use ice for a road don't always wait for 18 inches of hard ice. Every few years there will be someone who lives here that drives onto ice that is too thin to hold a car. And the car goes down without the use of any dynamite. With enough people, there will always be someone who is willing to chance driving on thin ice. And if a car is on ice that will just barely hold it, a stick of dynamite would surely sink it.
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| fsdreamscapes | POCB - Myth Not Busted! | 17 | May 1 2008, 8:44 AM EDT by arrowhawk | |||
|
Thread started: Mar 18 2008, 4:32 PM EDT
Watch
I'm sorry Mr. Producer...
I'm a pilot and a film maker and there are several scientific flaws in your mythbusting attempts at POCB... Firstly you were using the aircraft's speed from the pitot tube which is relative to airflow and did not have a tachometer attached to the wheels of the aircraft. The wheels of the aircraft are what the speed is measured at NOT relative to airflow over the aircraft's wings. The wheels in your test were moving faster than the conveyor belt and the myth is completely NOT busted. I believe there has been an error in attempting to bust this myth. The speed of the wheels freespinning on the conveyor belt *must* be matching the speed of the conveyor belt in the opposite direction... All you did in your episode was show that the airspeed of the aircraft @25 mph (indicated air speed) was enough to take off. Yet the wheels were moving faster than the conveyor belt thus producing an erroneous reading. The reference speed you were using for the aircraft had NO association with the wheel's speed. The theory is based upon treadmill speed and aircraft wheel speed *not* aircraft speed based upon airflow through the pitot tube. You need to run the test again and place tachometers to the wheels of the aircraft and ensure that the wheel speed matches that of the conveyor belt...
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| azands | Moose and Car | 4 | Apr 30 2008, 5:53 AM EDT by Mammela | |||
|
Thread started: Apr 27 2008, 12:08 AM EDT
Watch
You invalidated your Moose test by setting the carcass on a wooden platform and calling it legs. If the legs were connected to the body there would be a forward and upward thrust on the main body from the legs being hit. As it was the legs were cut out and the Moose fell on the car. The myth is not busted, poorly designed test.
| ||||||