Already a member?
Sign in
Episode 78: Walking on Water
| Help build the Web's best MythBusters episode guide! Click EasyEdit to add information about each episode. Don't see the EasyEdit button above? Sign in or sign up. New to wikis? Visit the Help section for tips on getting started. |
| EPISODE TITLE: Episode 78: Walking on Water ORIGINAL AIR DATE: 4/25/2007 SYNOPSIS: It's "East Meets West" in this episode of MythBusters. Shrouded in secrecy and mythology, not to mention cult popularity, ninjas are perfect fodder for the MythBusters. The whole team joins forces to pit science against martial arts mystique. Can ninjas run on water as movies like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon would have us believe? In "Walking on Water," Adam, Jamie and a ninjitsu master try their luck at aquatic agility. And if that doesn't work, the boys get confrontational as they compete to see how ninjas — masters of illusion — could create the impression of water running. In "Samurai Swing," Kari, Tory and Grant find out if a ninja could stop a samurai sword with his bare hands. To avoid the sharp sting of steel the team devises a ninja rig to clap onto the sword, and it seems like this myth is all in the timing. | |
| Myth #1:Walking on Water Can ninjas run on water? Myth #2:Samurai Swing Can a ninja stop a samurai sword with his bare hands? Myth #3:Catching an Arrow Can ninjas catch arrows in mid-flight? |
| Highlights of This Episode: Best Quotes by the MythBusters:
|
Latest page update: made by megascott
, Nov 13 2007, 3:25 PM EST
(about this update
About This Update
Added synopsis from Discovery Channel.
- megascott
149 words added
1 word deleted
view changes
- complete history)
149 words added
1 word deleted
view changes
- complete history)
Keyword tags:
adam savage
byron kari
byron kari mythbusters
chapman scottie
Discovery Channel
discovery channel myth busters
discovery.com mythbuster
grant imahara
jamie hyneman
myth busters
mythbuster
myths
urban legends
urban myths
More Info: links to this page
(Showing the last 5 of 9 - view all)
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| shiningking | Catching Arrow | 4 | Mar 10 2008, 5:23 AM EDT by jimmycords | |
|
Thread started: Oct 14 2007, 2:28 PM EDT
Watch
I saw the Ripleys episode too, and the major differences were that:
1. his hand followed the arrow 2. he used sound to to try to catch the arrow 3. the arrow was supposedly going only 100 mph |
||||
| Influenza | Arrow Catching | 1 | Mar 10 2008, 5:20 AM EDT by jimmycords | |
|
Thread started: Jan 12 2008, 7:45 AM EST
Watch
Arrow catching is possible.
Here in Australia you can't go past Anthony Kelly who is the Guinness World Record Holder for Arrow Catching, Paintball Catching, Blindfold Baintball Catching and Most spears caught from speargun underwater. http://www.thearrowcatcher.com.au |
||||
| redixpress | Other Problem with Catching an Arrow | 3 | Feb 22 2008, 4:50 PM EST by redixpress | |
|
Thread started: Dec 31 2007, 6:00 PM EST
Watch
One thing I haven't seen mentioned so far is this other problem with the "Catching an Arrow" myth. They claim it to be busted, but their testing was inconclusive at best. I considered the testing very incomplete. Several people have mentioned that a moving hand would work quite a bit better- this makes sense and is probably true. However, there's another problem which, to me, seems a more glaring problem with their testing.
Did anyone notice that, when the "superhuman" robo-hand was used, and one of them said that any slower a grab and it wouldn't have worked? WRONG. If you look at the high speed cam, you can see that the hand doesn't even START to close until the arrow's tip is going past (or close to it- don't recall exactly). The hand should start closing before the arrow gets to it so that as the arrow begins to pass through the hand, the fingers are are moving, have some momentum, and therefore have more time & length to grip the arrow shaft as well as more grip due to the momentum. Assuming they used the same timing for the previous, human-ninja-speed grab attempt, which is very likely, that's even worse- of course it won't be caught; the hand didn't even START to grip the arrow until the feathers were already going by. Now, I know they have a lot of stuff to do in not so much time, but normally Jamie and Adam do a much better job of being thorough and I was very surprised that they were so slack in not just the analysis of results but also the very small number of tests and variation of, well, variables. Don't get me wrong- I love the show- but segments like this one greatly cheapen it to, "Ooooh look at us we're making ROBONINJAS," rather than an at-least-mostly scientific method-using show that's also entertaining. When the show switches over to mainly entertainment & largely disposes of the scientific thinking, Mythbusters will Jump the Shark, so to speak. |
||||
| mustang_1 | arrow catching | 0 | Jan 24 2008, 10:35 PM EST by mustang_1 | |
|
Thread started: Jan 24 2008, 10:35 PM EST
Watch
does anyone remember how they made the catching hand close?
|
||||
| Mavrick67 | Arrow catching & more | 6 | Dec 17 2007, 2:41 PM EST by mediasmith | |
|
Thread started: Dec 11 2007, 4:18 PM EST
Watch
I remember seeing it done on TV 25 years ago, and finally found the guy who did it - Jim Mather:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Mather_(Kyoshi) |
||||
(Showing the last 5 of 9 - view all)
