Already a member?
Sign in
Official MythBusters Fan Site
Welcome to the official Discovery Channel MythBusters site where myth busting fans can discuss their favorite experiments, cast members, or anything related to the MythBusters TV show.
More Mythbusters Wiki Features
|
Latest page update: made by amy_c
, Apr 21 2008, 10:04 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by amy_c
32 words deleted
1 image deleted
view changes
- complete history)
32 words deleted
1 image deleted
view changes
- complete history)
Keyword tags:
buster
discovery
Discovery Channel
home
myth busters
myth_buster
Mythbuster's Fan Site
mythbusters
Mythbusters wiki
quotes
the busterboy
More Info: links to this page
(Showing the last 5 of 275 - view all)
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jerryred | THE FOOTBALL | 2 | 36 minutes ago by jerryred | |
|
Thread started: Today, 1:52 PM EDT
Watch
I HAVE A QUESTION THAT HAS BEEN HAUNTING ME FOR YEARS??
JUST BEFORE THE KICKOFF, AT THE START OF A FOOTBALL GAME, OR AFTER A TOUCHDOWN, AND THE KICKER SQUEEZES THE FOOTBALL BEFORE PLACING IT ON THE KICKING TEE, WHAT IF ANYTHING DOES THIS DO TO THE FOOTBALL? HAVE THE ENGINEERS FROM WILSON SPORTING GOODS, OR ANY OTHER FOOTBALL MANUFACTURES MADE ANY SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ON THE SUBJECT? DOES IT CHANGE THE SHAPE, SQUEEZE AIR OUT, THUSLY MAKING IT MORE AERODYNAMIC? I BELIEVE(AND I HAVE BEEN WRONG BEFORE) IN NEWTON'S THIRD LAW OF RELATIVITY THAT FOR EVERY ACTION THER IS AN OPPOSITE AND EQUAL REACTION, THERFORE SQUEZZING THE FOOTBALL BEFORE PLACING IT ON THE TEE DOES ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING TO THE FOOTBALL AT ALL!!! WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON MY THEORY? |
||||
| MrCommonSince | create fire with ice | 12 | Today, 8:37 AM EDT by amy_c | |
|
Thread started: Nov 9 2007, 10:43 AM EST
Watch
can you create fire with ice....the myth is that you could rub two ice cubes together so fast that the friction would be hot enough to create fire....i understand friction creates heat,,,but in this case, wouldnt the water turn to steam long before you could get fire.....to understand it on a bigger scale,,,imagine a airplane made of ice, if it crash landed on a glacier at top speed would there be enough friction to generate fire.........
|
||||
| xnubuy | gaz tank | 1 | Yesterday, 10:11 PM EDT by xnubuy | |
|
Thread started: Yesterday, 10:09 PM EDT
Watch
i just saw the water tank myth and im wondering what would happen if they put way to much pressure in one of those tank use to store helium in the helium baloon where the kid get taken away by those baloon...by the way in brazil a preist got the same idea he sat on a chair attached by some helium filled balloon and now he is missing hehehehe
|
||||
| smilts | The Benjamin Franklin kite and electricity Myth | 6 | Yesterday, 8:47 PM EDT by TrueThanny | |
|
Thread started: Mar 20 2008, 12:29 AM EDT
Watch
I was wondering in this myth they wanted to see if a kite with a lightening rod could conduct electricity to a key and from the key to a human and finally rather the human would live or not. They said there was no way he could live through a strike like that. My only problem with this is that people do live through lightening strikes. So isnt possible that he could have?
|
||||
| valente163 | Plane on treadmill | 15 | Monday, 7:21 PM EDT by valente163 | |
|
Thread started: Saturday, 7:58 AM EDT
Watch
As I understand it, the conjecture is that a plane cannot take off if the plane is going EXACTLY the same speed as the treadmill. In theory if that is so, then the plane will be stopped relative to the ground and also if the wind speed is "0" relative to the ground, there can be no air flowing past the wings. Therefore there can be NO LIFT from the wings. The second point that Martin mentioned, occurred to me to, namely that the airflow caused by the propellor past the wings, would cause some lift. I noticed on the MYTHBUSTERS episode that the propellor was some distance below the wings, and hence I would suppose that would cause minimum lift. However when the plane took off in the episode, THE PLANE WAS OBVIOUSLY MOVING RELATIVE TO THE GROUND AND HENCE AIR. Therfore the plane was moving a good bit faster than the "CONVEYOR BELT" It was this forward motion RELATIVE TO THE GROUND AND AIR which caused takeoff. Imagine that the plane was tied at it's back end to the ground. You now go to full revs. The plane will pull on the tether but still be stopped relative to the ground. Now under those circumstances, would anybody expect the plane to lift?(assuming negligeable lift from propellor wind) I say NO. Now imagine that you introduce a conveyor belt underneath the wheels(It could be on a conveyor belt which is stopped) Now ramp up the conveyor belt speed until the tether registers "0" tension and any faster, the plane would go bacwards. At that point if you cut the tether, would you expect the plane to lift? of course not because you have exactly the same situation as when the conveyor belt was stopped, the only difference being that the wheels are turning!!
|
||||
(Showing the last 5 of 275 - view all)
